March On

Last year on January 21st, my partner and I were walking into the subway station to travel to the Women’s March in Toronto. I clutched a sign I’d painted, feeling a little nervous, not sure what to expect. Carrying a sign can feel vulnerable, like your thoughts are showing on the outside. But walking to the platform, there were women everywhere, with signs or pussy hats, talking excitedly. They were so bright, so bold, so . . . visible. Excitement overrode nervousness.

We walked down to the platform following a group of three or four adult women, and six or so kids. They smiles and enthusiasm, splashed with pink and carrying signs, and stopped to take a group photo on the platform. One of the little girls carried a hand-painted sign that said SCIENCE MATTERS. Reader, it flattened me. Tears poured down my face.

When the subway arrived, it was filled with buzzing protestors. One woman said she loved my sign and handed me an extra pussy hat—those vulnerable thoughts on posterboard had become a connection. I’m not really a sports fan, and I admit I can get annoyed when the subway is blue and white and rowdy on the night of a Leafs or a Jays game. But for the first time, I understood the excitement. I wasn’t just riding a wave, I was part of it.

When we got to Queen’s Park, it turned out we were 60,000 strong—about six times what the Facebook invite had been when I’d last checked. (And around the world, millions strong.) I gathered with friends and coworkers and my partner, with my pal S’s two-year-old, whose presence made my heart swell even more. Her mother had been nervous about bringing her, feared violence, but she was soon reassured and glad to be there. Her daughter won’t remember that day like those young girls on the platform will, but she’ll be able to tell her friends she was there. I hope she’ll brag about it.

The weather was unusually mild for January, as if the heat of all those bodies, that noise, that enthusiasm had forced a thaw. I walked the streets of my city, feeling a sort of omnidirectional love. It sounds extreme (and corny), I know, but it’s true. It’s what they want you to feel in Loving Kindness meditation. In a big city, we all walk around in tiny bubbles, avoiding eye contact on the subway, always gazing into the middle distance. But for a day, connection felt possible.

We live in a democracy, where every person, in theory, has a voice, but aside from modest voting line-ups, it always feels unreal to me: watching those numbers climb on election day coverage is kind of unfathomable. But the day of that march, these numbers felt fathomable in its most old-fashioned sense: it felt like we were measuring the depth of the sea.

Leading up to the march I was reading Rebecca Solnit’s Hope in the Dark, which I now consider one of a handful of books that caught me in its current, that carried me onto a slightly different course. Some of its key principles are that hope is vital and also active—not a lottery ticket, but “an ax you break down doors with in an emergency”—and that small changes can have profound effects, though we may never know what they are—as the Zapatista uprising was “a flower whose weightless seeds were taken up by the wind.” I could spend a whole post quoting this book, but I hope that you’ll read it, find your own passages that light up like fireflies.

This year, the organizers are putting on another march, and I can’t go, which pains me. Longstanding plans out of town with friends flying in can’t be cancelled or moved. But there will be other marches, for other worthy causes, and I walked in some of them last year. In any case, there are still ways to help: I’ve given money to help offset organizational costs of this march, and tomorrow night I’ll show up to make signs and assist in any way I can. This makes me nervous, as any social situation where I might not know someone does, but I have to remember how I felt that day, that sense of kinship and solidarity, that shared purpose. These are not quite strangers.

The Cheeto presidency no longer seems like a fresh crisis, it’s true, and that will likely mean there aren’t millions in the streets around the world this weekend. But the man cooks up hot & fresh crises on the regular, whether it’s attempts to roll back DACA, ban travel from select Muslim countries, strip the vulnerable of health care, undermine climate change prevention, or slide fetal personhood into a tax bill. And Ivanka’s dad aside, women, racialized, LGBTQ+, and Indigenous people, migrants and the disabled all over the world must deal more often with violence, lower pay, restricted access to healthcare, education, and reproductive rights, and more. In a year of #MeToo and #TimesUp, we’ve seen there’s so much that we can do, and also so much more to do. And that prospect can seem exhausting, but let me reassure you that last year’s march was anything but.

“I can barely remember what seemed so pressing when I didn’t participate in great historical moments,” writes Solnit, “but I know that the same kind of things seem pressing now, and that I have to push some of them aside.” So if you can attend a local march this year, I hope you will. Coming together again is an opportunity to hear the power of our voices united, to recommit together to tackling oppression at home and abroad. To remember when we made history in 2017, and to remember that we are still making it, with what we do and don’t do. What kind of story it will be is up to us.

Dealasaurus Rex

My mother trained me from an early age that just about anything can be bought on sale—and as an extension, that really only things on sale should be bought. This seemed to serve me well enough, and over the 15 to 20 years this philosophy guided me, I certainly bought many things at a thrilling discounts. I’m not exaggerating: when I buy something that’s 70% off my brain probably lights up like I just ate a bowl of sugar. I was high not only on the new purchase, but on a feeling of triumph, that I was beating the system.

But of course I was not. I was still feeding the capitalist machine, still helping the retailer meet their goal: to take my money, and, more insidiously, to make me believe this was an empowering act, to etch those synaptic passageways of purchasing deeper into my brain. The store still wins.

Earlier this year, I read an article in Sophomore Magazine (I think this one) that pointed out that fast fashion is incompatible with feminism, namely because the burden of producing these “deals” disproportionately falls on women and children. And that was a bit of a Come to Jesus moment for me, since I try to make feminism one of my guiding stars, much like environmentalism, which obviously is also very anti-superfluous stuff. Mix in last year’s discovery of Mustachianism, which added a bottom-line motivation for not handing over my dollars, and you have pretty potent anti-consumerist cocktail. Resistance should have been easy.

I decided I would try to buy very few clothes, or at least buy used ones. I definitely bought less stuff, but there were exceptions. I bought a Lululemon sports-bra-cum-bathing-suit top in the summer with a gift card. I bought some jeans (made in Canada) and short boots on Boxing Day, this year (of course I still shopped, I’ve not yet the strength to abstain completely, I’ll admit). I bought a pair of Fabletics pants for myself when shopping for my sister on Black Friday, and I regret these and can’t return them. I may trade them away. And that’s it. (Though I did receive three Lululemon* items for Christmas. And a new pair of moccasins.** So let’s include those.***) Eight new things in nine months,**** and all (but one) things that met my standards of new purchases: 1) it is a useful tool or fills an actual, practical void, 2) it makes me feel capital-G Great, 3) I can see it lasting for years.

That said, with the help of the app Good on You, I’d like to add another principle: 4) That the company I’m buying from has good labour and environmental policies. This one is the toughest of course: it’s easy to forget—or be naive about—the realities of faceless people far away, and consumption is so normalized and anesthetized it’s easy to put distance between the chicken breasts on a bed of Styrofoam and an actual feathered thing. (Which makes it sound like I don’t eat meat. I do, though I try to impose consistent standards for that too.)

I watched the documentary The True Cost on Netflix pre–Boxing Day—I felt I needed something to help temper my own sales-induced fever. It’s worth watching, and two things really hit home for me. 1) When companies compete to make an item cheaper, shareholders don’t take the hit—factory workers do, in the form of diminished labour standards and human rights. 2) Only about 10% of the clothes we donate actually get sold in local thrift stores. The rest gets shipped to developing countries, like Haiti, where it guts the local clothing industry, and I’d imagine the rest ends up in landfill.

So far in my nine-ish months of buying less, I don’t feel like I’ve missed out on much. There’s more money in my bank account. I don’t have to go to the mall, or try to align my purchasing with the best possible sale. The stuff I have gets more wear. I know I didn’t use up resources producing, shipping, and packaging these things. I know I am not responsible for labour code violations. And I’ve taken a step back from an act that for me often prompts a strange mix of frenetic excitement and unease. (Sometimes the magnitude of it all—how do we live in a world with so many things?—threatens to unmoor me. And being reminded of nice things you don’t/won’t own isn’t exactly fun.) There will always be something newer, something nicer than what I own. But that doesn’t mean what I have isn’t good. Great, even. A while ago, I started telling myself, “That’s nice, but not necessary.” It’s separates the niceness of a thing from the desire to have it, and I’ve found it useful.*****

I’ve been thinking for a while about unsubscribing from all the mailing lists I’m on. But I’ve resisted—I don’t open most of the emails anyway, and what if I miss a really good deal? But am I really missing anything? And what’s the cost of having advertising in my inbox every single day? So today I unsubscribed. It might mean getting 1% of my attention back, but that’s something.

The next step might be an Ann Patchett type experiment—a year of buying no stuff that isn’t strictly necessary. Which could be really freeing, especially when each decision doesn’t need to agonized over. Maybe one day it’ll even feel as good as a deal.

 


*This, you can tell, is the hardest thing for me to give up, and I’ll admit to not fully setting my mind to it yet. No clothing makes me feel better about my body than these products, I use them constantly, and I’ve had items last a decade, so even the high-ish price tag is justifiable to me. Lululemon gets a medium grade from Good on You. I think I need to write a couple letters to encourage the company to improve on that.

** Made by Manitobah Mukluks, which is an Indigenous-owned company that contributes to projects that help Canada’s Indigenous communities. Some of their shoes were made in Canada, others overseas. I’m not sure where mine were made. These are replacing an old pair, which, admittedly, probably had one more year in them.

*** It must be said that without the pressure of receiving gifts from family (forgive how blindly privileged this sounds), I would have probably only bought one of these things, maybe none. But the politics of gift giving/receiving is something to discuss another time, but it is something I’m trying to slowly reengineer.

**** Full disclosure: This time period conveniently follows a Target bender in January, which meant about seven new clothing items. And one purchase from Forever21, which will now be ethically boycotted (an easy choice because entering that store I immediately feel about 80 years old and cranky).

***** Not to say one should never buy a nice new thing, especially if it meets those four criteria. And even more so if it’s something you use frequently. But 99% of the things that cross my radar probably aren’t ones that I think would truly make my life better.